Skip to content

Guide for parents · September 2026

Learning support for UK families, subject by subject

The four kinds of learning support families buy — supervision, explanation, practice and diagnosis — what each one fixes, and the usual ordering mistake.

"Learning support" covers four different products

The phrase is used by homework clubs, tuition agencies, apps, worksheet sites, school interventions and private teachers, and they are not variations on one thing. They do four distinct jobs. A family that buys the wrong one gets a service that works exactly as advertised and changes nothing, which is a peculiarly frustrating outcome because there is nobody to blame.

Naming the four makes the choice much easier, and it usually reveals that the thing you need is cheaper than the thing you were about to buy.

Kind of supportWhat it actually doesWhat it fixesWhat it cannot fix
SupervisionKeeps a child at the table and on taskAvoidance, drift, a chaotic eveningNot understanding the work
ExplanationRe-teaches an idea, live, by a personA specific thing never understoodAnything nobody has identified yet
PracticeRepeats a skill until it is automaticFluency, speed, retentionA method learned incorrectly
DiagnosisFinds which earlier skill the errors depend onNot knowing what to work onNothing, by itself — it only points

The ordering mistake

Families overwhelmingly buy explanation first, because that is what is most heavily marketed and because it feels like the serious response. A weekly hour with a tutor is a real commitment and it looks like taking the problem seriously.

The trouble is that explanation is the only one of the four that requires you to already know what is wrong. Booked without that, the first several sessions become an informal diagnosis conducted at the hourly rate, or worse, become supervision — an adult sitting with a child while they do homework that was going to get done anyway.

Diagnosis is the cheapest of the four and should almost always come first. It is also the only one that changes what the other three should aim at.

Choosing by symptom rather than by product

Start from what you are actually seeing at home, not from what is available to buy.

If the work gets done but takes three times as long as it used to, that is a fluency problem and practice is the answer. If your child can do the work when you sit down with them and not otherwise, that is supervision, or independence, and paying for explanation will teach them nothing new. If they can recite a method perfectly and cannot say why any step happens, that is explanation. And if the same specific error keeps coming back across weeks, that is a wrong rule that needs finding before any of the others will help.

The last case is the one that defeats extra practice most reliably, because practising a wrong method makes it more automatic rather than less.

What a gap actually is

Maths makes this easiest to see, which is why it dominates the rest of this site. Almost every topic stands on an earlier one, so an error in Year 8 can have its origin in Year 5 and the child in between looks fine. Ratio cannot work while fractions are shaky. Fractions cannot work while equivalence is shaky. Equivalence cannot work while multiplication facts are slow.

Other subjects are less tidy. Reading comprehension does not decompose into a numbered chain — it depends on vocabulary, background knowledge, inference and the habit of noticing when understanding has stopped, all at once. Writing depends on structure more than on vocabulary. Those are real and identifiable, but they are found by observation rather than by a short set of questions, and it is worth being clear about that difference rather than implying every subject can be audited the same way.

What can be checked here, and what cannot

The check on this site is a maths check: twenty questions across eighteen skills, from Year 5 to Year 9, taking about twelve minutes, free, with no card required. What it does is trace a wrong answer back to the skill it depended on — an error on adding unlike denominators sends it to lowest common multiples, equivalent fractions and like-denominator addition, and the follow-up answers say which of those is the real problem.

What it does not do: cover every subject, cover the whole of maths, compare your child to a national sample, or identify a specific learning difficulty. Those last two are the claims to be most suspicious of anywhere online. A twenty-question set cannot honestly produce a percentile, and no quiz diagnoses dyslexia or dyscalculia.

Sequencing your own year

A workable order for most families is: observe for a fortnight before buying anything, check for a cause, practise the one named thing in short regular sessions, and only then decide whether live explanation is needed and what it should be aimed at. That order costs the least and produces the most specific brief if you do end up hiring someone.

It is also reversible at each step. Two weeks of short practice on the wrong target costs two weeks. A term of weekly tuition on the wrong target costs a term and a good deal of money.

Questions parents ask about learning support

Can software replace a tutor?

For practice and for finding a gap, it does a job a weekly hour cannot — it happens every day and it does not forget what happened last time. For live explanation, motivation, a relationship with an adult who knows your child, or exam coaching, it does not come close and pretending otherwise would be dishonest.

My child has support at school already. Does anything at home help?

Usually, if it is aimed at the same thing. Ask the school what the intervention is targeting and align with it rather than running a second, different programme. Two uncoordinated efforts can pull a child in opposite directions.

How much time at home is reasonable?

Short and regular, on most days, rather than a long weekend session. The reason is spacing: recalling something after a gap is what moves it into reliable memory, and a single long session gives you no gaps at all.

What if we cannot tell which of the four we need?

Then diagnosis is the answer by definition, and it is the cheapest of the four. Not knowing what is wrong is precisely the condition it exists for.